It seems that Kennedy wanted to blow the whistle when he found out about the true scale of corruption within the establishment and how freemasonry and other secret societies play an integral part in this corrupt agenda. It also seems that Kennedy wanted to speak out about the closed and secretive nature of organisations like the freemasons, especially at the higher levels. And it is only when a freemason reaches the higher levels that he can gain a fuller understanding of the kind of organisation he is part of. Freemasonry also has its own set of rules, oaths, allegiances and rituals. And the higher up you go in freemasonry, the more bizarre the initiation rituals become; this is a hallmark of the way criminal gangs operate. Remember, just because someone wears a suit and a tie, that doesn't make them a better person than the hoodie you see in the alley with the baseball bat.
I find it very curious that some people compare Obama with Kennedy, as if they are both one and the same. But you only have to look at the people that Obama has recruited to work alongside him to realise where he's coming from. Employing Zbigniew Brzezinski as his Chief Foreign Policy advisor is just one example. Then on top of that, Obama admits to being a globalist and he has publically admitted to attending a CFR meeting where he gave a speech. But what makes me feel most uncomfortable is the way that Obama stuttered and lied about the significance of his speech at the CFR. When questioned about his CFR involvement, Obama said "I don't know if I'm an official member" - He wants us to believe that the CFR would allow someone to attend their meeting and give a speech, and yet not even discuss the issue of membership. You're either a member of something or you're not, so the word "official" is an irrelevant filler word. If he doesn't know that he's a member then that could only mean that he is not a member - in which case, why didn't he just say: "I am not a member, although I did speak there once"? Why not just be open and honest about it instead of stuttering and lying to attempt to downplay the significance of it?
JFK didn't mince his words and when I listen to him I never get the impression that he is trying to pull the wool over my eyes. It is so nice to hear a president who speaks so openly about subjects like secret societies. It is also nice to hear a president who, unlike Bush and Obama, can string a sentence together without stuttering and without leaving ambiguity about what he really means. Listen to any of Kennedy's speeches, and then listen to a speech from the likes of Obama or Bush. The difference is astounding. Kennedy speaks eloquently and from the heart, and you can tell that his words have not been scripted for him by the elite string-pullers. Conversely, when you listen to the hypnotic political rhetoric of someone like Obama, you get the distinct impression that he is nothing more than a puppet who speaks the words of those who control him. Obama is the "Manchurian Candidate" who has been engineered into office (by the very people that JFK warned us about) in order to give us false hope so that we stay on this carousel horse that is the new world order agenda.