Umno Palsukan Fakta dan Nafikan Ibrahim Yaakob

Oleh Tarmizi Mohd Jam

NAMPAKNYA kerajaan begitu giat berkempen bagi menjayakan sambutan '50 Tahun Kemerdekaan Negara' tahun lalu. Kini kempen itu kian suram. Tiada gerakkan yang menyanggah atau membetulkan fakta palsu yang disogokkan kononnya Tunku dan Umnolah yang menggerakkan usaha kemerdekaan. Bagaimanakah laungan 'Merdeka' oleh Ibrahim Yaakob? Dan apa kaitannya dengan gerakkan merdeka yang diperjuangkan oleh PKMM, KMM, API dan AWAS sebelum diharamkan penjajah? Ikuti pandangan Pengarah Jabatan Pilihan Raya PAS Wilayah Persekutuan, CIKGU ISHAK SURIN yang juga antara aktivis yang terlibat diperingkat awal gerakan kemerdekaan, ketika aktif bersama API bersama Pengarang Berita, TARMIZI MOHD JAM.

Harakah: Saban tahun, menjelang Ogos nampaknya kerajaan giat berkempen melalui media cetak dan televisyen sambutan hari kemerdekaan. Tujuannya untuk tanamkan kepercayaan bahawa Umnolah yang mempelopori kemerdekaan. Walhal faktanya palsu...

CIKGU ISHAK SURIN: Memanglah itu yang sedang berlaku. Usaha ini giat dijalankan untuk menafikan gerakkan awal kemerdekaan negara. Pada masa yang sama, kerajaan cuba menonjolkan Umnolah yang mempelopori kemerdekaan.

Bagi saya, usaha terancang begini amat dayus dilakukan oleh kerajaan semata-mata untuk mempengaruhi genarasi muda kini akur bahawa Umno dan pemimpin hari ini adalah kesinambungan pejuang kemerdekaan. Umno cuba menafikan fakta sejarah yang sebenar. Siapa Tunku pada waktu merdeka dulu? Siapa Umno? Macam mana Umno itu ditubuhkan?

Semuanya ini perlu dikaji semula oleh kita supaya fakta sejarah yang sebenar dapat diketahui oleh genarasi akan datang dan seterusya. Pada saya, Umno begitu takut untuk membongkar rahsia sejarah sebenar berhubung gerakan kemerdekaan ini. Pejuang-pejuang terdahulu seperti Ibrahim Yaakob, Ahmad Boeastamam, Dr. Burhanuddi Helmy dan lain-lain cuba dihapuskan dalam buku-buku dan dokumentasi sejarah.

Gerakan KMM, PKMM, API dan AWAS juga tidak disebut sebagai pelopor kemerdekaan sedangkan hakikatnya, kumpulan inilah yang mula-mula melaung dan membakar api kemerdekaan.

Maknanya kita ada pandangan kedua dalam isu ini. Umno bukan pelopor kemerdekaan. Tunku Abdul Rahman bukan Bapa Kemerdekaan. Begitu...

Ya. Ini patut di ketengahkan. Ia bukan idea atau sanggahan membabi buta tetapi ia adalah fakta sejarah. Ia tak boleh ditipu. Sejarah tetap sejarah. Dengan adanya kempen-kempen media cetak dan televisyen ini, kita amat bimbang genarasi muda sekarang dibohongi kerajaan dan Umno khususnya. Mereka mahu fakta sejarah dipesongkan, diseleweng!

Dalam hal ini, saya amat bertegas bahawa Umno bukan pelopor kemerdekaan. Umno ditubuhkan untuk menentang pembentukan Malayan Union. Tidak langsung disebut pada masa itu soal kemerdekaan.

Sebelum itu, telah ada kumpulan tertentu yang bergerak secara tersusun, selepas sahaja tamat Perang Dunia Kedua. Umpamanya penubuhan Kesatuan Melayu Muda (KMM) yang dipimpin oleh Ibrahim Yaakob. Diikuti penubuhan Parti Kebangsaan Melayu Malaya (PKMM) yang dipimpin oleh Dr. Burhanuddin Al-Helmy dan Ishak Haji Muhamad. Angkatan Pemuda Insaf (API) dipimpin oleh Ahmad Boestamam.

Merekalah yang memulakan gerakan tersusun untuk menentang penjajahan Inggeris di tanahair kita. Inilah golongan yang sebenarnya patut diketahui oleh rakyat dan genarasi kini.

Bukannya seperti yag diwar-warkan, Umno atau Tunku Abdul Rahman. Sebaliknya, orang-orang ini dilupakan langsung. Akibat laungan kemerdekaan mereka dan keberanian mereka menentang penjajah, maka mereka akhirnya disumbat dalam penjara dan KMM, PKMM, API dan AWAS diharamkan oleh penjajah.

Jadi, bila Umno muncul dalam catatan sejarah sebagai pejuang kemerdekaan?

Selepas pejuang kemerdekaan tulin macam Ibrahim Yaakob, Dr. Burhanuddin, Ishak Haji Muhamad, Ahmad Boestaman dan lain-lain dipenjarakan. Selepas KMM, PKMM, API dan AWAS diharamkan. Barulah mereka muncul. Seolah-olah pemimpin-pemimpin Umno inilah yang beriya-iya mahukan kemerdekaan setelah ruang kosong yang ditinggalkan oleh KMM, PKMM, API dan AWAS. Kita kena tahu, Umno ketika ini adalah anak didik penjajah dan bukan penentang penjajah.

Tadi disebut kumpulan awal macam KMM, PKMM, API dan AWAS adalah pejuang tulin kemerdekaan. Kemudian ditahan dan pertubuhan mereka diharamkan. Penjajah pula mengetengahkan Umno hasil kekosongan ini sebab hanya Umno yang boleh meneruskan dasar-dasar penjajah. Soalnya, mengapa penjajah menentang atau tidak bersengkongkol dengan kumpulan pejuang gerakan kemerdekaan tulin yang awal?

Inggeris tahu, mereka yang menggerakkan KMM, PKMM, API dan AWAS terdiri dari pejuang kemerdekaan tulin yag tidak mahu bersengkongkol dengan penjajah. Mereka ini tidak dapat diperkotak-katikkan oleh Inggeris.

Jika ditakdirkan mereka ini berjaya memerdekakan tanahair kita, tentu sekali lanskap politik negara kita tidak seperti hari ini. Selepas diberikan kemerdekaan pada 1957, kita masih dibelenggu dengan pemikiran penjajah, dasar-dasar penjajah diteruskan, pendidikan penjajah dijalankan, ekonomi penjajah diperkenalkan dan macam-macam lagi.

Kita diikat oleh penjajah. Dan yang sanggup menjalankan dasar-dasar penjajah ini ialah Umno. Inggeris percaya, jika kemerdekaan diberi kepada pejuang tulin macam Ibrahim Yaakob, dasar-dasar Inggeris tak dapat berjalan.

Sekarang jelas, sejarah dipalsukan dari segi gerakan menuntut kemerdekaan. Ini kerana Umno yang diberi kemerdekaan oleh Inggeris telah menggunakan kesempatannya sebagai kerajaan untuk memalsukan sejarah dalam semua aspek. Dokumentasi, buku sejarah dan seumpamanya. Bagaimana Cikgu melihat, 'jenayah' ini boleh dibetulkan?

Perkara ini harus ditangani secara serius. Lihat balik pemalsuan sejarah dan sejarah sebenar. Betulkan fakta dalam buku sejarah yang jadi rujukan sebagai teks bacaan pelajar kita di sekolah-sekolah. Ini penting.

Kerana melalui paparan dari buku-buku sejarah inilah, pemalsuan berjalan secara rasmi dan terancang. Pelajar-pelajar kita adalah genarasi akan datang yang bakal mentadbir negara.

Tetapi, fakta sejarah yang melekat dalam kepala mereka hanyalah fakta palsu. Mereka tak kenal siapa itu Ibrahim Yaakob, iaitu orang yang mula-mula melaungkan kalimah ?merdeka? kepada rakyat untuk mengnyahkan penjajah ketika itu.

Mengapa Cikgu kata Ibrahim Yaakob yang mempelopori kemerdekaan bukan Tunku Abdul Rahman?

Saya setuju dengan satu kajian yang dibukukan oleh Umno Johor. Buku itu dakwa orang yang mula mempelopori gerakan kemerdekaan tanahair ialah Ibrahim Yaakob. Berpusat gerakanya di Maktab Perguruan Idris, Tanjung Malim.

Bagaimana kita lihat, dia membentuk jaringan dari sini hingga idea kemerdekaan bertaburan ke seluruh tanahair hingga ke Brunei, Singapura, Sabah dan Sarawak. Ibrahim aktif menanamkan api kemerdekaan dalam kesatuan pelajar di Maktab.

Dari sini, pelajar Brunei, Singapura, Sabah dan Sarawak yang tamat pengajian mereka, bawa balik idea dan perjuangan kemerdekaan ini. Jadi menyeluruh. Di sinilah mula bibit kemerdekaan tercetus. Fakta ini dinafikan oleh Umno yang cuba meletakkan Tunku sebagai Bapa Kemerdekaan. Bagi saya, Ibrahim Yaakoblah patut dinabatkan Bapa Kemerdekaan sebenar bukan Tunku yang tak tahu apa-apa.

Jika begitu realitinya, apakah terdapat usaha dari pihak PAS untuk membetulkan senario ini atau menggerakkan suatu penulisan semula sejarah kemerdekaan Malaysia?

Kita kena betulkan fakta palsu Umno itu. Gembelingkan tenaga. Kumpulkan pejuang-pejuang yang terlibat diawal gerakan kemerdekaan tulin. Kumpulkan kajian-kajian ilmiah yang dilakukan oleh universiti-universiti.

Bagi saya, penulisan semula sejarah kemerdekaan wajib dibuat. Kita jangan asyik menyanggah soal kemerdekaan ini dalam tulisan-tulisan picisan ketika menjelang setiap kali sambutan hari kemerdekaan. Kita mesti sedarkan rakyat bahawa Umno bukan parti yang mempelopori gerakan kemerdekaan di tanahair kita. Tunku bukan Bapa Kemerdekaan.

Semuanya ini kita mesti persoalkan semula secara serius. Bukan main-main. Kita kena buat satu jawatankuasa khusus untuk tujuan ini. Saya percaya, semua tokoh-tokoh sejarah dalam negara kita akan bersama dengan kita jika usaha terancang dibuat untuk membetulkan fakta sejarah ini.

Tidak mengikut acuan sejarah yang disediakan oleh Inggeris dan dipekik-pekikkan oleh Umno. Saya yakin, fakta yang ada adalah fakta orientalis Barat yang mahu dilihat sebagai tiadanya penentangan serius dari rakyat terhadap penjajahan mereka.

Pemerintahan diberi secara aman kepada Umno bagi menunjukkan baik dan bijaknya Inggeris pada mata dunia. Saya setuju, PAS mesti mempelopori usaha ini kerana ia penting untuk genarasi akan datang. Ia tak boleh tunggu lebih lama lagi. Kalau lebih lama, maka banyaklah penyelewengan sejarah akan dilakukan oleh Umno.

Asean human rights plan runs into opposition

BANGKOK | March 1,2009 | Malaysianinsider - Inter Press News Service

Plans to create a regional human rights body for Asean, the 10-nation South-east Asian bloc, are threatening to expose the gulf that separates countries that seek to respect political and civil liberties and the notorious violators.

An incident on Saturday during a summit of Association of South-east Asian Nations revealed the tough road that lies ahead for the high-level panel of experts tasked with drafting the terms of reference (ToR) for this body.

Burmese Prime Minister Gen. Thein Sein and Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen had threatened to walk out of a face-to-face meeting government leaders were to have with civil society representatives from across the region – if the latter included human rights activists from Burma and Cambodia.

A compromise struck to enable the 20-minute meeting to go ahead during the 14th Asean summit, being held in this resort town south of Bangkok, ensured that the Burmese military regime and the increasingly authoritarian Cambodian government got their way.

The eight-member group from South-east Asian civil society organisations (CSOs) attended the dialogue with the region’s presidents and prime ministers sans Khin Ohmar, head of the Network for Democracy and Development in Burma, and Pen Somony, programme coordinator of Cambodia Volunteers for Civil Society.

“It is disappointing but not unexpected,” Khin Ohmar told IPS. “Asean leaders need to take into serious consideration what the (Burmese) regime is all about. The Burmese regime’s rejection shows it is not serious about Asean’s push for a human rights body.”

For his part, the Cambodian premier not only objected to Pen Somony’s name but also wanted to insert a Cambodian activist of his own choosing to be part of the CSO team, according to a member of civil society who participated in the dialogue.

“The human rights body was discussed during our dialogue,” said Sinapan Samydorai, convenor of the task force on Asean migrant workers, who was part of the CSO delegation. “We do want a body that is affective.”

In fact, the civil society delegation was surprised by a welcome nod given by Vietnamese Prime Minister Nguyen Tan Dung to the clamour by activists that the people of Asean should be seen as partners rather than as obstacles in the regional alliance’s quest to establish its new identity as a people-centred group.

“The Vietnamese leader said that while the non-interference principle (of Asean) holds true, he welcomes the interface (with civil society),” said Thitinan Pongsudhirak, political scientist at Bangkok’s Chulalongkorn University, who moderated the dialogue on Saturday afternoon between CSOs and government leaders.

Asean, which was established in 1967 to stem the spread of communism during the height of the Cold War, includes Brunei, Burma (or Myanmar), Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam.

Last December, Asean adopted a charter to make the regional entity a rules-based body and more “people centred.”

But the promotion and protection of human rights varies among countries. Indonesia, the Philippines and Thailand are more open to such precepts, while Malaysia and Cambodia have a mixed record. Brunei, Burma, Laos, Singapore and Vietnam suffer from a human rights deficit in varying degrees.

Bridging this gap is a daunting challenge if Article 14 of the Asean charter is to be met. That article is the need to establish an Asean human rights body (AHRB) to promote and protect human rights across the region.

“The establishment of an Asean human rights body (AHRB) would be based on three main principles,” Sihasak Phunagketkeow, a senior Thai diplomat and chairman of the high- level panel to draft the ToR, told journalists on Saturday. “We are talking of building and strengthening the human rights regime in the region.”

The three principles are: realistically “bear in mind the diversity in Asean,” establish a credible AHRB through “consistency with internationally accepted human rights standards and norms,” and develop AHRB “continually” through an “evolutionary process”.

During the current summit, Sihasak chaired an hour-long meeting with Asean foreign ministers to share the progress of the ToR, the final draft of which is to be presented at a July ministerial meeting in Thailand.

“We hope to establish this body at the next Asean summit to be held later in the year in Thailand,” Sihasak revealed. “I don’t think this is a PR (public relations) exercise.”

But the region’s human rights activists have reservations about the confidence of the Thai diplomat that Asean will have a human rights body on par with similar regional rights mechanisms in Africa, Latin America and Europe.

Doubts stem from the manner the ToR has been treated – as a secret document, not open to public scrutiny – and the insistence of the drafters on placing greater emphasis on promoting human rights awareness than protection from rights violations where abuses can be investigated.

“This [the ToR] is supposed to be a public document, but they are keeping it a secret,” says YuYun Wahyuningrum, an Indonesian national who is the East Asia programme manager at the Asia Forum for Human Rights and Development, a regional rights lobby. “We want the document to be out so that we can make our input and it will be the basis of a public debate.”

“Civil Society was invited to only one meeting to discuss the ToR, but that too was not based on the draft document. We were only asked to give our opinions,” the Indonesian human rights activist told IPS. “Only some governments are interested in our views – Thailand, Indonesia and the Philippines.”

An opening in cyberspace closes

BANGKOK - When a state-linked Cambodian Internet service provider (ISP) blocked access this month to a critical non-governmental organization report detailing the government's alleged mismanagement of natural and energy resources, the censorship closed the loop on the region's fast-closing cyberspace.

The Cambodian government has prioritized improving its Internet controls and legislation, despite the fact less than 0.3% of the population is online, one of the lowest Internet penetration rates in the world. The recent bust of an alleged terror plot against the government revealed that authorities had capability to hack intosuspects' - and perhaps perceived other adversaries' - e-mail accounts.

It wasn't long ago that Asia's Internet was being heralded as an inexorable force for democratic change across the predominantly authoritarian-run region. Rising Internet penetration rates and the proliferation of websites that provided alternative news and critical views, particularly in countries where the state had long dominated information flows, marked substantial democratic gains. [more]

'IMF, World Bank measures favor rich countries'

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 02:04:06 GMT   |    PressTV

Central Bank of Iran Governor Mohammad Bahmani

Iran has criticized international financial institutions for their silence on the massive injection of money into the economies of rich countries.

"Since the beginning of the economic crises in America and some major European countries, they ratified economic stimulus packages and injected thousands of billions of dollars into their economies that would increase inflation in the world in the near future," the governor of the Central Bank of Iran (CBI) said on Tuesday.

Addressing a meeting of the International Monetary Fund and World Bank in Algiers, Mohammad Bahmani accused the IMF and World Bank of allowing the US and European countries to inject fiat currencies into their economies.

The US credit crunch has exacerbated the global recession, prompting governments to push through massive economic stimulus packages and overshadowing efforts to reform the global financial system.

Bahmani also called on the IMF and World Bank to increase their support for poor and developing countries, which are experiencing many problems due to the global economic meltdown.

In a meeting on Sunday in Berlin, the heads of Europe's largest economies agreed on the need for greater regulation of financial markets. 

The President Who Told The TRUTH

This vid contains one of the most awesome, inspiring and truthful speeches ever given by a president. This very speech must have caused a lot of panic among the higher echelons of the elite. Kennedy had been in office for only 3 months and he was already taking unprecedented steps to empower ordinary people. Kennedy did more for civil rights than any other president since Abraham Lincoln. Kennedy was a big supporter of the constitution, he was against the tyranny of big government. He wanted to withdraw US troops from Vietnam. He wanted to abolish the CIA and Federal Reserve, and he warned us of criminal elements within the establishment who wanted to seize an opportunity to restrict people's freedoms. He urged the press to be more open and to fulfill its obligation to inform the American people about pertinent facts. And on top of that he spoke openly and candidly about the dangers of secret societies and their influence over the way government works. So is it any wonder that he was dramatically silenced only two years after making this epic speech?

It seems that Kennedy wanted to blow the whistle when he found out about the true scale of corruption within the establishment and how freemasonry and other secret societies play an integral part in this corrupt agenda. It also seems that Kennedy wanted to speak out about the closed and secretive nature of organisations like the freemasons, especially at the higher levels. And it is only when a freemason reaches the higher levels that he can gain a fuller understanding of the kind of organisation he is part of. Freemasonry also has its own set of rules, oaths, allegiances and rituals. And the higher up you go in freemasonry, the more bizarre the initiation rituals become; this is a hallmark of the way criminal gangs operate. Remember, just because someone wears a suit and a tie, that doesn't make them a better person than the hoodie you see in the alley with the baseball bat.

I find it very curious that some people compare Obama with Kennedy, as if they are both one and the same. But you only have to look at the people that Obama has recruited to work alongside him to realise where he's coming from. Employing Zbigniew Brzezinski as his Chief Foreign Policy advisor is just one example. Then on top of that, Obama admits to being a globalist and he has publically admitted to attending a CFR meeting where he gave a speech. But what makes me feel most uncomfortable is the way that Obama stuttered and lied about the significance of his speech at the CFR. When questioned about his CFR involvement, Obama said "I don't know if I'm an official member" - He wants us to believe that the CFR would allow someone to attend their meeting and give a speech, and yet not even discuss the issue of membership. You're either a member of something or you're not, so the word "official" is an irrelevant filler word. If he doesn't know that he's a member then that could only mean that he is not a member - in which case, why didn't he just say: "I am not a member, although I did speak there once"? Why not just be open and honest about it instead of stuttering and lying to attempt to downplay the significance of it?

JFK didn't mince his words and when I listen to him I never get the impression that he is trying to pull the wool over my eyes. It is so nice to hear a president who speaks so openly about subjects like secret societies. It is also nice to hear a president who, unlike Bush and Obama, can string a sentence together without stuttering and without leaving ambiguity about what he really means. Listen to any of Kennedy's speeches, and then listen to a speech from the likes of Obama or Bush. The difference is astounding. Kennedy speaks eloquently and from the heart, and you can tell that his words have not been scripted for him by the elite string-pullers. Conversely, when you listen to the hypnotic political rhetoric of someone like Obama, you get the distinct impression that he is nothing more than a puppet who speaks the words of those who control him. Obama is the "Manchurian Candidate" who has been engineered into office (by the very people that JFK warned us about) in order to give us false hope so that we stay on this carousel horse that is the new world order agenda.

Livni, Netanyahu seeking potential coalition partners

Shireen Yassin, Press TV, Al-Qud Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:00:56

1 in 4 Israeli below poverty line

Mon, 02 Feb 2009 11:31:00 GMT | PressTV

An Israeli homeless man sleeps in Jerusalem, 2006

Israel spends millions of dollars to pour bombs on Gazan civilians and sit back to watch one fourth of its people live below poverty line, a new report says.

War on Gaza reminds that the Zionist utopia is far from coming true. The heir of Ben- Gurion must detach from the idea of “military supremacy” and reinvent a new national identity, according to an article published on France's weekly L'Express.

The article cites the semi-annual poverty report published by Israel's National Insurance Institute that the poor in Israel became poorer in the second half of 2007 and the first half of 2008.

It goes on to add that 1 in 4 Israeli lives below poverty line representing 1.63 million people, 777,400 of them children.

A recent report in Israeli Haaretz website said the percentage of unemployed poor families rose in relation to the previous report for 2007, from 69 percent to 71.4 percent. However, the percentage of working poor also rose: Families with two or more breadwinners living below the poverty line increased from 21.3 percent to 23.6 percent.

L'Express magazine also added that the global economic crisis is determined to leave 14,000 industrial workers unemployed by the end of the year 2009.

The article adds Palestine's 60 years of resistance has still not taught Israel that there is no military solution to its conflict with the Palestinians. So soon after the failed Israeli invasion of Lebanon, Israel made the same mistake again.

The act was even condemned within Israel. Even Israeli reservists have reportedly refused to enter the war on Gaza in protest at the ongoing killing of women and children. They say they prefer days in prison than Gaza and killing hundreds of civilians, including women and children.

Egypt, Israel blasted for Gaza closure

Mon, 02 Feb 2009 10:21:45 GMT | PressTV

John Ging, Gaza Strip director of operations for the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestinian refugees (UNRWA)

UN Relief and Works Agency operations Chief John Ging says the Israeli war on the Gaza Strip has caused an 'unbelievable' damage to the strip.

According to Palestinian sources, John Ging said on Sunday that tens of thousands of Gazans have been homeless and now they are living under tents due to the three-week Israeli incursion into the blockaded region.

Referring to the major damage to the houses and health centers, the UNRWA operations chief said, nearly one million people of 1.5 million Gaza's population depend on international aides while UNRWA is facing lots of problems due to the closed crossings of strip.

John Ging also condemned Israel and Egypt for closing the crossings into the Gaza Strip, calling on Cairo and Tel Aviv to ease the siege so that the organization can deliver 'thousands of tons of aid' to Gaza residents.

Working closely with the Israeli regime in its 18-month blockade on the already impoverished region, Cairo has refused to open the Rafah border-crossing even during the 23-day Israeli offensive in which Gazans were in dire need of food, fuel and particularly medicine.

Ging earlier said that "Shamefully, there are thousands of tons of aid waiting on the borders of Gaza that need to be connected right now with the people here."

"The donors have been very generous, the operation in getting it from all over the world to this part of the world has been a success and very quick, but now we have the bottleneck, and of course it has to be that the government of Israel in the first instance has to find operational solutions to get the crossing points open."

Referring to the Israeli strikes on the UN schools, Ging said that the Israeli strikes on the UN schools in the Gaza strip during the war were unacceptable as no fighters were in the school when the attack occurred.

Israeli strikes on three UN-run schools in the Gaza Strip killed at least 48 civilians and wounded 100 others during the war. One of the Strikes took place as UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon was in Israel.

20 years of conflict costs ME $12 trillion

Sun, 25 Jan 2009 12:55:21 GMT     |     PressTV

A report says conflict in the Middle East has cost $12 trillion.

A recent study has revealed that armed conflicts in the Middle East have cost the region a staggering USD 12 trillion over the past 20 years. 

The fourteen digit figure was released as part of a study conducted by the Indian Strategic Foresight Group and financed by various research groups around the world, Reuters reported. 

The study suggests that the figure explains just how critical peace can be in stimulating growth in the Middle East, especially at a time of economic slowdown throughout the world. 

"The choice they have to make is the choice between the danger of devastation and the promise of peace," said Strategic Foresight Group President Sundeep Waslekar, who took part in the study. 

"Considering the enormity of the costs evidenced in this report which have direct or indirect negative consequences for the whole world, the urgent necessity of a stronger international engagement is inescapable," senior Swiss diplomat Thomas Greminger, who also contributed to the study, said. 

The research focused on the devastating effect of the region's most recent military venture -- Israel's 22-day offensive on the Gaza Strip, which claimed the lives of 1,330 Palestinians, wounded 5,000 and left thousands homeless. According to data released by Tel Aviv, 12 Israeli soldiers and three civilians were also killed in the conflict. 

According to the study's figures and analyses, Middle Easterners are now half as rich as they would have been if there had been peace since 1991. 

The study says next year's per capita income in Israel would have been USD 44,000 in the absence of Israel's military campaign, almost twice as much as the expected USD 23,304. 

As for the Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, it says the figure could be USD 2,427 instead of USD 1,220. 

Next year's income per head in Iraq is projected at USD 2,375, one quarter of the USD 9,681 that would have been possible if that there had been peace during the past 20 years. 

In the Middle East, which stretches from Iran in the east to Egypt in the west, Israel has fought the most wars. During its 60-year-old history Israel has taken part in nine armed conflicts. 

Israeli Rabbi: Beautiful Rachel saved army

Sun, 25 Jan 2009 19:26:06 GMT | PressTV

Rabbi Ovadia Yosef says Mother Rachel helped Israeli soldiers kill Gazan fighters.

The spiritual leader of Israel's ultra-orthodox Shas party says a beautiful young woman sent by God assisted the Israeli army in Gaza.

Following rumors of a woman appearing before Israeli troops, warning them of danger ahead in different locations in Gaza, Rabbi Ovadia Yosef gave his rabbinical seal of approval to the widely tossed around battlefield tale.

"The soldiers arrived at a house and wanted to go inside. There were three armed terrorists waiting for them there."

"And then a beautiful young woman appeared before them and warned: Don't enter the house, there are terrorists there, be careful," said the prominent Israeli religious leader in his Shabbat sermon.

When asked by the Israeli soldiers, Yosef said, the woman introduced herself as "Rachel" -- the biblical matriarch, the beloved wife of Jacob.

The 80-year old rabbi then went on to say that with the help of Mother Rachel the soldiers found the terrorists inside the place and killed them.

As founder and spiritual leader of Shas, Rabbi Yosef is believed to be held in almost saintly regard by hundreds of thousands of Jews of Middle Eastern and North African origin.

Earlier this week, former Israeli Chief Rabbi Mordechai Eliyahu had confirmed the rumor, saying, "The story is true. I sent her."

Nigerian goat detained for armed robbery

Sat, 24 Jan 2009 19:25:20 GMT | PressTV

Many Nigerians believe that some people have shapeshifting powers and can transform themselves into animals or objects.

A goat has been taken to the police in Nigeria on suspicion of attempted armed robbery in the African country's western Kwara State.

A group of vigilantes took the animal to the police arguing it was an armed robber who was trying to steal a Mazda 323.

The vigilantes claimed the robber had used black magic to transform himself into a goat so that he could escape arrest.

"The group of vigilante men came to report that while they were on patrol they saw some hoodlums attempting to rob a car. They pursued them. However one of them escaped while the other turned into a goat," Kwara state police spokesman Tunde Mohammed told Reuters.

"We cannot confirm the story, but the goat is in our custody. We cannot base our information on something mystical. It is something that has to be proved scientifically that a human being turned into a goat," he added.

Residents come to the police station to see the goat and a national newspaper has printed its photograph.

Belief in witchcraft and shapeshifting powers is common among Nigerians.

Posturing and Laughter as Victims Rot

By Robert Fisk | The Independent January 21 2009

Mahmoud Abbas stepped further into humiliation by saying the only option for Arabs is to make peace with Israel

The front page of the Beirut daily As-Safir said it all yesterday. Across the top was a terrible photograph of the bloated body of a Palestinian man newly discovered in the ruins of his home while two male members of his family shrieked and roared their grief. Below, at half the size, was a photograph from Israel of Western leaders joking with Ehud Olmert, the Israeli Prime Minister. Olmert was roaring with laughter. Silvio Berlusconi, arms on the back of Olmert's shoulders, was also joshing and roaring – with laughter, not grief – and on Olmert's right was Nicolas Sarkozy of France wearing his stupidest of smiles. Only Chancellor Merkel appeared to understand the moral collapse. No smiles from Germany.

Europe laughs while Palestinians mourn their dead. No wonder that in the streets of Beirut, shops were doing a flourishing trade in Palestinian scarves and flags. Even some of Palestine's most serious enemies in Lebanon wore the Palestinian keffiyeh in solidarity with the people of Gaza. Over and over again, Al-Jazeera television strapped headlines on to their news reports of Palestinians carrying the decomposing corpses of their dead: "More than 1,300 dead in Gaza, 400 of them women and children – Israeli dead in the war 13, three of them civilians." That, too, said it all.

All day, the Arabs also had to endure watching their own leaders primping and posing in front of the cameras at the Arab summit in Kuwait, where the kings and presidents who claim to rule them also smiled and shook hands and tried to pretend that they were unified behind a Palestinian people who have been sorely betrayed. Even Mahmoud Abbas was there, the powerless, impotent leader of "Palestine" – where is that precisely, one had to ask? – trying to suck some importance from the coat-tails and robes of his betters.

Slipping and sliding on the corpses of Gaza, these assembled supreme beings should perhaps be pitied. What else could they do? Saudi King Abdullah announced £750,000 to rebuild Gaza; but how many times have the Arabs and the Europeans been throwing money at Gaza only to see it torn to shreds by incoming shell-fire?

It has to be said that the two cowled Hamas gunmen who announced that they had won a "victory" in the ruins of Gaza were only fractionally less hypocritical. Still they had not understood that they were not the Hizbollah of Lebanon. Gaza was no longer Beirut. Now, it seemed, Gaza was Stalingrad. But whose uniforms did Hamas think they were wearing: German or Soviet?

"Israel has to understand," the good king said – as if the Israelis were listening – "that the choice between war and peace will not always stay open and that the Arab initiative (for Arab recognition in return for an Israeli withdrawal to the 1967 borders of Israel) that is on the table today will not stay on the table." He knew that "an eye for an eye ... did not say an eye for the eyes of a whole city". But how many times – how many bodies have to be pulled from the ruins – before the Saudis realise that time has run out?

The Israelis briskly dismissed land for peace in 2002 but yesterday they suddenly showed their interest again. "We continue to be willing to negotiate with all our neighbours on the basis of that initiative," the Israeli government spokesmen said – as if his own country's original rejection had never been thrown at the Arabs.

President Bashar al-Assad of Syria, of course, dismissed the whole initiative in Qatar last week as dead, insisting that Israel be declared a "terrorist entity". But Mahmoud Abbas stepped further into humiliation yesterday by announcing that the "only option" for Arabs was to make peace with Israel. It was Arab "shortcomings" that led to the failure of the 2002 Arab initiative. Not Israel's rejection, mark you. No, it was all the fault of the Arabs. And this from the leader of "Palestine".

No wonder America's man in Egypt – a certain Hosni Mubarak – repeated the tired old slogan that "peace in the Middle East is an imperative that cannot be delayed". And then the Emir of Kuwait invited Bashar and Hosni and King Abdullah of Jordan and the other King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia to have lunch together – the menu was not disclosed – to end their feuding.

Al-Jazeera showed the ever-more putrid bodies being tugged from beneath cross-beams and crushed concrete as these mighty potentates debated their little disputes. There was really no adequate comment for this charade.

President George W. Bush Farewell Speech

Israel Bombs "SAFEHOUSE SHELTER"

January 09, 2009 BBC World

Israel bombs safehouse shelter, the Israelis told the civilians to go there for a safe shelter. There were 100 people 55 children inside the shelter when the Israel Air Force bombed the earlier designated shelter.

A topic before Bush leaves his Office

Olmert’s Poodle

As Israel entered the third week of its Gaza blitz, Prime Minister Ehud Olmert regaled a crowd in Ashkelon with an astonishing tale.

He had, said Olmert, whistled up George Bush, interrupted him in the middle of a speech and told him to instruct Condi Rice not to vote for a U.N. resolution Condi herself had written. Bush did as told, said Olmert.

The crowd loved it. Here is the background.

After intense negotiations with Britain and France, Secretary of State Rice had persuaded the Security Council to agree on a resolution calling for a cease-fire. But Olmert wanted more time to kill Hamas.

So, here, in Olmert’s words, is what happened next.

“In the night between Thursday and Friday, when the secretary of state wanted to lead the vote on a cease-fire at the Security Council, we did not want her to vote in favor.

“I said, ‘Get me President Bush on the phone.’ They said he was in the middle of giving a speech in Philadelphia. I said I didn’t care. ‘I need to talk to him now.’ He got off the podium and spoke to me.

According to Olmert, Bush was clueless.

“He said: ‘Listen. I don’t know about it. I didn’t see it. I’m not familiar with the phrasing.’”

“I told him the United States could not vote in favor. It cannot vote in favor of such a resolution. He immediately called the secretary of state and told her not to vote in favor. …“She was left shamed. A resolution that she prepared and arranged, and in the end she did not vote in favor.”

The U.N. diplomatic corps was astonished when the United States abstained on the 14-0 resolution Rice had crafted and claimed her country supported. Arab diplomats say Rice promised them she would vote for it.

State Department spokesman Sean McCormack, with Rice at the United Nations during the debate on the resolution, said Olmert’s remarks were “just 100 percent, totally, completely untrue.”

But the White House cut Rice off at the knees, saying only that there were “inaccuracies” in the Olmert story. The video does not show Bush interrupting his speech to take any call.

Yet the substance rings true and is widely believed, and Olmert is happily describing the egg on Rice’s face:“He (Bush) gave an order to the secretary of state, and she did not vote in favor of it — a resolution she cooked up, phrased, organized and maneuvered for. She was left pretty shamed. …”

With Bush and Rice leaving office in hours, and Olmert in weeks, the story may seem to lack significance.

Yet public gloating by an Israeli prime minister that he can order a U.S. president off a podium and instruct him to reverse and humiliate his secretary of state may cause even Ehud’s poodle to rise up on its hind legs one day and bite its master.

Taking such liberties with a superpower that, for Israel’s benefit, has shoveled out $150 billion and subordinated its own interests in the Arab and Islamic world would seem a hubristic and stupid thing to do.

And there are straws in the wind that, despite congressional resolutions giving full-throated approval to all that Israel is doing in Gaza, this is becoming a troubled relationship.

Two weeks ago, Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni, in opposing any truce, assured the world there “is no humanitarian crisis in the (Gaza) Strip,” and the humanitarian situation there “is completely as it should be.”

Not so to Hillary Clinton. In her confirmation hearings, the secretary of state-designate, reports the New York Times, “struck a sharper tone toward Israel on violence in the Middle East.”

Clinton “seemed to part from the tone set by the Bush administration in calling attention to what she described as the ‘tragic humanitarian costs’ borne by Palestinians, as well as Israelis.”

More dramatic was a weekend report by the Times‘ David Sanger that the White House had rebuffed Olmert’s request for new U.S. bunker-buster bombs and denied Israel permission to overfly Iraq in any strike on Iran’s nuclear enrichment plant at Natanz.

Sanger described these U.S.-Israeli talks as “tense.”

Repeatedly, Israel has warned that Iran is close to a bomb and threatened to attack unilaterally. Indeed, Israel simulated such an attack in an air exercise of 100 planes that went as far as Greece.

Bush both blocked and vetoed that attack, says Sanger. But he did assure Olmert that America is engaged in the sabotage of Iran’s nuclear program by helping provide Tehran with defective parts.

This would seem a stunning breach of security secrets, but no outrage has been heard from the White House, nor has any charge come that the Times compromised national security.

With Olmert, Rice, and Bush departing, and Obama and Hillary taking charge committed to talking to Iran, can the old intimacy survive the new friction and colliding agendas?

Patrick J. Buchanan - Information clearing house.

Gaza ceasefire negotiations

Hamas and Israel consider ceasefire proposal as Israel steps up campaign.

For the first time since the Israeli attack on Gaza began, the diplomatic effort approached a tangible achievement. Hamas announced Wednesday it will conditionally accept a ceasefire proposal offered by Egypt. Israel sent Amos Gilad, General Major (Reserves) to discuss the Egyptian proposal in Cairo. The Real News spoke to George Rishmawi, founder of a multimedia independent network in Palestine called the International Middle East Media Center. Rishmawi says the proposal offers an immediate end to violence, but does not necessitate an Israeli withdrawal, a condition Hamas said it would not sacrifice. Israel's conditions were pending on a complete cessation of the rocket attacks from Gaza and an arms embargo. Further diplomatic efforts by Condoleezza Rice have involved the US Navy. Rice urged Israel's Minister of Foreign Affairs, Tzipi Livni, to sign a memorandum of understanding stipulating the United States will secure the end of arms smuggling into Gaza by monitoring the Gaza shore.

Gaza and the Palestinian Authority

George Rishmawi: The PA is not doing enough to oppose the invasion or lobby on the international level

As casualties of the Israeli attack exceed 1000 dead and 4600 injured, ground troops circle in on Gaza City. The Real News spoke to George Rishmawi, founder of the independent media source called International Middle East Media Center. In this first interview in the series, Rishmawi says Israel must be tried in international courts for war crimes committed during this attack and condemns the Palestinian Authority for failing to take initiatives on that front. Rishmawi also says that if the stated Israeli goal was to stop the so-called rocket attacks on Southern Israel, after 20 days of bombing the Gaza Strip they are still failing. Though Israel’s stated strategic plan of the attack has been to eradicate Hamas, almost half of the dead are civilians. Rishmawi discusses how this will affect power relations in Palestine and the unending feud between Hamas and the Fatah-led Palestinian Authority.

Bio

George N. Rishmawi is the director of the Palestinian Center for Rapprochement between People in Beit Sahour and co-founder of the International Solidarity Movement (ISM). Rishmawi is based in Beit Sahour, Palestine, and is also the Director of the International Middle East Media Center.

Gaza & Obama

Eric Margolis: Israel has handed the Obama administration a 'fait accompli'

Bio

Eric Margolis is a journalist born in New York City and holding degrees from Georgetown the University of Geneva, and New York University. During the Vietnam War he served as a US Army infantryman. Margolis is the author of War at the Top of the World –- The Struggle for Afghanistan and Asia is a syndicated columnist and broadcaster whose articles have appeared in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, The International Herald Tribune, Mainichi Shimbun and US Naval Institute Proceedings. Margolis is an expert of military affairs, a former instructor in strategy and tactics in the US Army, and a member of the International Institute of Strategic Studies and the Institute of Regional Studies in Islamabad, Pakistan. Eric Margolis' books have been published in the US, Canada, Britain, and India. He often appears and contributes to national and international news items for outlets such as CNN, ABC,CBC and Voice of America to the Wall Street Journal and Maninichi-Tokyo. He broadcasts regularly on foreign affairs for Canadian TV (TV Ontario and CBC), radio, and has appeared on ABC, CBS, CNN, and PBS

THE GREAT ARAB BETRAYAL THAT STINKS

Betrayal is the only truth that sticks - Arthur Miller

The Arab Collaborators

The often asked question, when it comes to the Palestinians, is about the role of Arab countries in the Palestinian struggle for freedom. The people not familiar with the political landscape of the area often see the Middle East as two camps, Arab countries on one side and Israel on the other.The reality is totally different. Israel has seldom been alone. Beside its usual American, French, British and other staunch allies, she has had the hidden backing of several Arab countries.

For close to 30 years now, many Arab countries have been collaborating with Israel; some like Egypt (gained independence: 1922) and Jordan (gained independence: 1946) openly, while others like Saudi Arabia (founded: 1932), UAE (founded: 1972) and Kuwait (founded: 1961) from behind the scenes.The reasons for this collaboration vary from country to country but they all have one thing in common: the rulers of these countries are all dictators and need foreign protection from their own people. Some such as Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Kuwait and UAE were put in power by the British. The founder of Saudi Arabia, Abdul-Aziz bin Saud (the kingdom is name after him) was put in power by the British.

The same goes for the others, except Egypt which experienced a coup by the army officers in 1952, resulting in the ousting of the monarchy and the accompanying British influence. But the Western influence returned with Anwar Sadat. All these countries are dictatorships and all are under pressure from their people. What they cannot accept is any democratically elected form of government in their mist. They fear that if an Arab government becomes democratic they may have to become one themselves, hence losing power. One of the things that they love about Mahmoud Abbas, the Palestinian president, is that he won the election not by popular vote but by popular method of rigging the election; something that these Arab leaders understand and respect.

In contrast, Hamas really represented the aspiration of the people. As soon as Mahmood Abbas' term as resident is over and he had to stand for re-election, he would surely lose. In contrast, Hamas really won the municipal elections in 2005 and the Parliamentary election in 2006. The elections were supervised by international observers, many from Europe, and US.

Palestinians were fed-up with the corrupt regime of Mahmoud Abbas and Fatah. They wanted to clean house. But as soon as Hamas took over, the US and the Europeans put an embargo on Hamas, calling it a terrorist organisation and not a peace partner. Israel closed the borders and refused to let anything into Gaza. Egypt also did the same.

What is not mentioned much in the media is that this was done with the complete approval of the Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Jordan. After all, Egypt could have opened its border for transfer of food and fuel. The reasons behind this hostility were and are that Hamas is a truly elected government and worst of all, Hamas is a branch or an off-shoot of Muslim Brotherhood of Egypt.

Muslim Brotherhood has a branch or related organisation in Jordan as well.Egypt and Jordan are worried that should Hamas survive and show its resistance, their people may get the idea that they can also resist the tyrannical rule of these despots. One must not forget that Muslim Brotherhood represents the only serious challenge to the Mubarak's rule in Egypt.

Egypt

The 81 year old Hosni Mubarak of Egypt has been "president" since 1981 (28 years). He has won every election with a comfortable majority. He is much loved by his secret services. Prior to every election he arrests and imprisons all the opposition, ensuring a "clean" election. Torture is so widely used and accepted in Egypt that US outsources torturing of some its prisoners to Egypt. This alone should tell you volumes about the nature of Mubarak's rule. He is now trying hard to crown his playboy son as his successor.But the Americans are not so sure if the son is capable of keeping the 80 million Egyptians in line and are therefore looking for alternative candidates.

The head of the feared main secret service is one of the prime candidates along with some of the top generals. Challenging him is the Muslim Brotherhood organisation, enjoying grass root support from all sections of the Egyptian society including Lawyers, doctors, judges and student associations. Not surprisingly, US and Israel call Muslim Brotherhood a terrorist organisation.

By all accounts, the Muslim Brotherhood be it in Jordan, Egypt or the occupied territories such as Gaza runs a clean operation, running many charity organisations and providing services to the poor and the needy. As such wherever they are, they pose a threat to the corrupt regimes, since they provide an alternative to the people of that area.

Jordan

King Abdullah II of Jordan, born of a British mother, educated in the West, including the Jesuit Center of Georgetown University, was brought to power by the CIA. His Uncle was a long time crown price, yet after his father died in a US hospital, Madeline Albright, Clinton's Secretary of Estate flew to Jordan to inform the Jordanians that the King on his death bed had changed his will and named his son Abdullah as his successor. The new king Abdullah II is married to the Queen Rania, a Palestinian.

The majority of this Kingdom of 5 million people are Palestinians who are not very friendly to this King. In 1967 there was a Palestinian uprising (led by the PLO) against King Hussein (ruled: 1952-1999, the father of the current king), which resulted in heavy casualties among Palestinians. In addition, the Kingdom is currently full of Iraqi refugees who resent the King's help to the Americans in invasion of their country. On top of all this, we have the Muslim Brotherhood which tries hard to abolish the monarchy. King Abdullah relies heavily on the US support and backing for staying in power. King Abdullah also sees a natural ally in Israel, a country that can come to its aid in case of another uprising.

Saudi Arabia (House of Saud)

I don't have to tell you much about Saudi Arabia. The Kingdom is run by the 84 year old, ailing Abdullah bin Abdul Aziz Al Saud. His personal wealth is estimated at $21 billion USD. He rules a clan of 8000 princes who in turn rule the country. Saudi Arabia is the centre of corruption in the Arab world. The Saudi rulers corrupt everything with their money. Lacking the necessary mental power or physical courage, they try to stay in power by subterfuge, lies, and deception.

They fund the real extremists on the one hand while portraying themselves as the protectors of the Western interest on the other. They preach intolerance and xenophobia to their people decrying the Western decadence, while spending a lot of time enjoying the life in the West. They pay the West for protection against their own people and they pay the extremists to do their fighting elsewhere. Saudi rulers are indeed the worst of them all.

House of Saud is also the financier of the so called Arab Moderates and the extremism that they cause. House of Saud financed the Mujahedeen in Afghanistan to fight the Soviets. They later financed the Taliban. They also paid Saddam Hussein to fight Iran. Then they paid the Americans and Egyptians to fight Saddam Hussein. They are the financiers of death and misery. They finance anything, anywhere, as long as this reduces the threat to their illegitimate rule. They are currently financing the civil war in Somalia, bandits in Baluchistan (Pakistan and Iran) and god knows what else. They are detested by their own people and neighbours yet loved by Bush, Cheney and the oil companies.

As long as they provide the money and oil the US is willing to tolerate them. And guess what? The Muslim Brotherhood hates the House of Saud too. This makes them a threat and hence they have to be dealt with.

The Collaboration

As can be seen, each country has a selfish reason to eliminate Hamas, but each is restrained by its population. Israel has no such a restraint imposed on it. She not only can wage a terrible war, but she also gets assistance from Arab countries. Indeed it is the second time (the first was the invasion of Lebanon in 2006) that Israel is getting open and solid support from these Arab countries. The invasion of Gaza was discussed in Egypt before its implementation.

Egypt, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia are Israel's active partners.

Egypt is actively involved in stopping all aids from getting to Palestinians in Gaza save a token few trucks. These few trucks are allowed to go through so they can be filmed and shown to Egyptian people. All demonstrations are banned, and all Egyptian volunteers for Gaza are either arrested or sent back.

There are hundreds of thousands of volunteers across the Muslim world that are willing to go to the aid of the Palestinians, but the Egyptian authorities don't allow them passage. Egyptians even stop medical aid from passing through their territory.This is part of a report from Associated Press:

RAFAH, Egypt:

Frustration is mounting at Egypt's border with the Gaza Strip, where many local and foreign doctors are stuck after Egyptian authorities denied them entry into the coastal area now under an Israeli ground invasion.

Anesthesiologist Dimitrios Mognie from Greece idles his time at a cafe near the border, drinking tea and chatting with other doctors, aid workers and curious Egyptians.

"This is a shame," said Mognie, who decided to use his vacation time to try help Gazans. He thought entering through Egypt, which has a narrow border with the Hamas-ruled strip, was his best bet. "That in 2009 they have people in need of help from a doctor and we can go to help and they won't let us. This is crazy," he added.

In addition there are many Iranian cargo planes full of food and medicine which have been sitting on the tarmacs in Egypt for days waiting for permission to deliver their cargo. Egyptians even denied the medical aid sent by the son of the Libyan President Qaddafi to land in Egypt.

One thing is clear: these three countries do not want the Israelis to fail in their mission of totally destroying Gaza. Hosni Mubarak said so himself. The daily Haaretz reported that Hosni Mubarak had told European ministers on a peace mission that Hamas must not be allowed to win the ongoing war in Gaza.

As Egypt physically aids the Israeli military by denying food, fuel and medicine to the civilians, the House of Saud helps Israel by giving her time and diplomatic cover. When Israel started its invasion there was an immediate call for an Arab summit. Saudi Arabia and Jordan (along with Egypt of course) delayed the summit. The Saudis along with the UAE said that they had another meeting to attend to and therefore Palestinian issue had to wait. After a few days when the summit was eventually held, they issued the same old statements.

Yet this time same as the Israel's invasion of Lebanon in 2006, they blamed the victims. In a statement, Saudi Arabia blamed Hamas for Israel's continuing offensive in the Gaza Strip. Saudi Arabia, after blaming Hamas, declared that it will not even consider an oil embargo on Israel's supporters. She then again blamed Hamas.

By this time, the three Arab countries along with Kuwait and UAE began singing the old song: international community is not doing anything about the catastrophe that is taking place in Gaza. It seems that these Arab tyrants have no shame at all.

This reminds me of a quote from Marquis De Sade (1740-1814): "One is never so dangerous when one has no shame, than when one has grown too old to blush."

These Arab leaders (many are indeed too old to blush) are complicit in the murder of so many civilians, especially young children. According to Agence France-Presse, quoting the medics on the ground, fully one third of all people killed have been children. How can these Arab leaders justify this to their people?

The answer is that they cannot. Israel knows this and for the second time can show the Arab street that their leaders are nothing but a bunch of old hypocrites. These Arab leaders are now exposed and can do nothing but to cooperate fully with Israel and US. What stand between them and their people's rage is their army and secret services; which in turn are supported by US.

Israel has cleverly exposed these leaders for what they are: collaborators of the worst kind. These Arab leaders have brought an unimaginable shame to their people. To quote Lucien Bouchard: I have never known a more vulgar expression of betrayal and deceit. Our hope is now with the people of these countries to clean this stain from their honour.

By Dr. ABBAS BAKHTIAR

- lives in Norway. He is a management consultant and a contributing writer for many online journals. He's a former associate professor of Nordland University, Norway and can be contacted at: Bakhtiarspace-articles@yahoo.no.